View source for Talk:GVD Hatshepsut

Same as with the Colossus. Should this be changed into similar format as the other ship pages already have? For the performance and tech descriptions parts. [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 08:52, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Yes. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 18:09, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)

==The GVD Memphis==
Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803|Droid803]]
*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius|Mobius]]
**I'd really hate agreeing with Mobius, but he's right on this one IMO. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 08:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)