GVD Hatshepsut - Revision history

TopAce: /* Veteran Comments */ spelling

2021-08-10T10:12:33Z

Veteran Comments: spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 10 August 2021
Line 97:		Line 97:


	''Mentioned above, the Hatshepsut can be very effective against bombers. On both sides, but more on ~~it's~~ right side, there are many flak batteries. Though only [[Standard Flak]], wings of fighters and bombers are decimated. Even cruisers and corvettes take surprising damage when near the Hatshepsut's front-right or front-left sides.''		''Mentioned above, the Hatshepsut can be very effective against bombers. On both sides, but more on its right side, there are many flak batteries. Though only [[Standard Flak]], wings of fighters and bombers are decimated. Even cruisers and corvettes take surprising damage when near the Hatshepsut's front-right or front-left sides.''

Aesaar: /* Statistics */

2012-10-10T01:33:45Z

Statistics

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:33, 10 October 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:
	==Performance:==		==Performance:==
	===Statistics===		===Statistics===
	{{Ship Stats\|Destroyer\|Akheton Corporation\|N/A\|15.0\|N/A\|N/A\|135 000\|N/A\|2126}}{\|-		{{Ship Stats\|Destroyer\|Akheton Corporation\|N/A\|150.0, 150.0, 150.0\|15.0\|N/A\|N/A\|135 000\|N/A\|2126}}{\|-
	\| style="width:200px"\|'''[[Technical_Terms_and_Definitions#Fighter Complement\|Fighter Complement]]'''		\| style="width:200px"\|'''[[Technical_Terms_and_Definitions#Fighter Complement\|Fighter Complement]]'''
	\| style="width:200px"\|Not known. Presumably similar or superior to Typhon (30 wings).		\| style="width:200px"\|Not known. Presumably similar or superior to Typhon (30 wings).

The E: /* Modding Resources */

2011-04-04T10:08:19Z

Modding Resources

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:08, 4 April 2011
Line 63:		Line 63:

	==Modding Resources==		==Modding Resources==
	{{shipimage\|image=[[Image:NewHatshepsut.png\|~~300px~~]]\|caption=The GVD Hatshepsut in FSO 3.6.12}}		{{shipimage\|image=[[Image:NewHatshepsut.png\|600px]]\|caption=The GVD Hatshepsut in FSO 3.6.12}}
	'''Retail''':		'''Retail''':
	:$POF File: capital2v-01.pof		:$POF File: capital2v-01.pof
Line 76:		Line 76:
	First In-Game Model: RgaNoris on 30/06/2010<br>		First In-Game Model: RgaNoris on 30/06/2010<br>
	Completed In-Game Model: RgaNoris on 05/08/2010<br>		Completed In-Game Model: RgaNoris on 05/08/2010<br>



	==Gallery==		==Gallery==

Droid803: /* Veteran Comments */ STOP IT WITH THESE USELESS GENERALIZATIONS. MY COCK IS GOOD. IT IS A FAVORITE AMONG MANY. NOTHING NEW.

2011-04-03T22:24:14Z

Veteran Comments: STOP IT WITH THESE USELESS GENERALIZATIONS. MY COCK IS GOOD. IT IS A FAVORITE AMONG MANY. NOTHING NEW.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 3 April 2011
Line 90:		Line 90:

	==Veteran Comments==		==Veteran Comments==
	{{comment\|The Hatshepsut is a good destroyer. 3 BVas, variety of anti-fighter defense, it's a favorite among many. It is also the strongest GTVA destroyer in terms of armor; it has 35,000 more hit points than any Terran destroyer. The only flaw with this ship is the placement of the main guns. The one on the bow is well placed, but in order for the other 2 to fire, a ship would have to be above it. Other than that, the Hatshepsut is a great warship.		{{comment\|''The Hatshepsut is not as effective against fighters as the [[GTD Hecate]]-class, but her BVas beams mean danger to anything that's larger than a bomber and can be targeted by heavy beam cannons. It is a setback that the beam turrets are large, thereby being easy to hit and vulnerable. On the plus side, the destroyer itself is more durable than any other [[GTVA]] destroyer.''


	''The Hatshepsut is not as effective against fighters as the [[GTD Hecate]]-class, but her BVas beams mean danger to anything that's larger than a bomber and can be targeted by heavy beam cannons. It is a setback that the beam turrets are large, thereby being easy to hit and vulnerable. On the plus side, the destroyer itself is more durable than any other [[GTVA]] destroyer.''

TopAce: /* Veteran Comments */ spelling

2011-04-03T09:58:11Z

Veteran Comments: spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:58, 3 April 2011
Line 90:		Line 90:

	==Veteran Comments==		==Veteran Comments==
	{{comment\|The Hatshepsut is a good destroyer. 3 ~~Bvas~~, variety of ~~Anti~~-fighter defense, it's a favorite among many. It is also the strongest GTVA destroyer in terms of armor; it has 35,000 more hit points than any ~~terran~~ destroyer. The only flaw with this ship is the placement of the main guns. The one on the bow is well placed, but in order for the other 2 to fire, a ship would have to be above it. Other than that, the Hatshepsut is a great warship.		{{comment\|The Hatshepsut is a good destroyer. 3 BVas, variety of anti-fighter defense, it's a favorite among many. It is also the strongest GTVA destroyer in terms of armor; it has 35,000 more hit points than any Terran destroyer. The only flaw with this ship is the placement of the main guns. The one on the bow is well placed, but in order for the other 2 to fire, a ship would have to be above it. Other than that, the Hatshepsut is a great warship.

Basilisk135: /* Veteran Comments */

2011-04-03T08:22:05Z

Veteran Comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:22, 3 April 2011
Line 90:		Line 90:

	==Veteran Comments==		==Veteran Comments==
	{{comment\|''The Hatshepsut is not as effective against fighters as the [[GTD Hecate]]-class, but her BVas beams mean danger to anything that's larger than a bomber and can be targeted by heavy beam cannons. It is a setback that the beam turrets are large, thereby being easy to hit and vulnerable. On the plus side, the destroyer itself is more durable than any other [[GTVA]] destroyer.''		{{comment\|The Hatshepsut is a good destroyer. 3 Bvas, variety of Anti-fighter defense, it's a favorite among many. It is also the strongest GTVA destroyer in terms of armor; it has 35,000 more hit points than any terran destroyer. The only flaw with this ship is the placement of the main guns. The one on the bow is well placed, but in order for the other 2 to fire, a ship would have to be above it. Other than that, the Hatshepsut is a great warship.


			''The Hatshepsut is not as effective against fighters as the [[GTD Hecate]]-class, but her BVas beams mean danger to anything that's larger than a bomber and can be targeted by heavy beam cannons. It is a setback that the beam turrets are large, thereby being easy to hit and vulnerable. On the plus side, the destroyer itself is more durable than any other [[GTVA]] destroyer.''

SypheDMar: /* Veteran Comments */ Double-spaced

2011-03-20T16:20:08Z

Veteran Comments: Double-spaced

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 20 March 2011
Line 104:		Line 104:
	''The Hatshepsut's an all-round ship capable of defending itself from anything up to destroyer-class warships. While it is more durable than any other destroyer in the GTVA, I think its major flaw is that it has only three beams that can do serious damage to other ships as large as it is. This severely compromises its survival rate should it actually go toe-to-toe with another warship. In the main campaign, I've never ever seen a Hatshepsut duke it out with an intact warship; the only thing I saw was it taking out two slightly damaged cruisers with its [[AAAf]]s and [[Fusion Mortar]]s. However, if it comes under attack by bombers, I could just sit back and watch it take them all out on its own.		''The Hatshepsut's an all-round ship capable of defending itself from anything up to destroyer-class warships. While it is more durable than any other destroyer in the GTVA, I think its major flaw is that it has only three beams that can do serious damage to other ships as large as it is. This severely compromises its survival rate should it actually go toe-to-toe with another warship. In the main campaign, I've never ever seen a Hatshepsut duke it out with an intact warship; the only thing I saw was it taking out two slightly damaged cruisers with its [[AAAf]]s and [[Fusion Mortar]]s. However, if it comes under attack by bombers, I could just sit back and watch it take them all out on its own.

	Another thing to note about the Hatshepsut is the awkward placement of its three main guns, which are only capable of firing simultaneously at enemies above the destroyer. Only one of its main guns is well-suited for a head-on assault which, when compared to the combined frontal firepower of its Second Shivan Incursion counterparts—the Ravana's two [[LRed]]s and [[SRed]]s and the Hecate's [[BGreen]] and [[TerSlash]]—isn't a lot for a destroyer.''}}
			''Another thing to note about the Hatshepsut is the awkward placement of its three main guns, which are only capable of firing simultaneously at enemies above the destroyer. Only one of its main guns is well-suited for a head-on assault which, when compared to the combined frontal firepower of its Second Shivan Incursion counterparts—the Ravana's two [[LRed]]s and [[SRed]]s and the Hecate's [[BGreen]] and [[TerSlash]]—isn't a lot for a destroyer.''}}
	[[Category:Ship]]		[[Category:Ship]]

Snail: /* Gallery */ upgraded Veteran Comments header to lv. 2

2011-03-20T12:28:30Z

Gallery: upgraded Veteran Comments header to lv. 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 20 March 2011
Line 89:		Line 89:


	===Veteran Comments===		==Veteran Comments==
	{{comment\|''The Hatshepsut is not as effective against fighters as the [[GTD Hecate]]-class, but her BVas beams mean danger to anything that's larger than a bomber and can be targeted by heavy beam cannons. It is a setback that the beam turrets are large, thereby being easy to hit and vulnerable. On the plus side, the destroyer itself is more durable than any other [[GTVA]] destroyer.''		{{comment\|''The Hatshepsut is not as effective against fighters as the [[GTD Hecate]]-class, but her BVas beams mean danger to anything that's larger than a bomber and can be targeted by heavy beam cannons. It is a setback that the beam turrets are large, thereby being easy to hit and vulnerable. On the plus side, the destroyer itself is more durable than any other [[GTVA]] destroyer.''

Snail: /* Gallery */ swapped about

2011-03-20T12:27:43Z

Gallery: swapped about

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 20 March 2011
Line 82:		Line 82:

	<gallery>		<gallery>
			Image:RScreen0031.png \| A Pre-HTL Hatshepsut, and a [[GTF Myrmidon]].
	Image:RScreen0066.jpg \| A GVD Hatshepsut leads a Vasudan battlegroup through the darkness.		Image:RScreen0066.jpg \| A GVD Hatshepsut leads a Vasudan battlegroup through the darkness.
	~~Image:RScreen0031.png \| A Pre-HTL Hatshepsut, and a [[GTF Myrmidon]].~~
	Image:RScreen0069.jpg \| The GVD Hatshepsut, in all its glory.		Image:RScreen0069.jpg \| The GVD Hatshepsut, in all its glory.
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Black Wolf at 19:28, 31 December 2010

2010-12-31T19:28:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 31 December 2010
Line 84:		Line 84:
	Image:RScreen0066.jpg \| A GVD Hatshepsut leads a Vasudan battlegroup through the darkness.		Image:RScreen0066.jpg \| A GVD Hatshepsut leads a Vasudan battlegroup through the darkness.
	Image:RScreen0031.png \| A Pre-HTL Hatshepsut, and a [[GTF Myrmidon]].		Image:RScreen0031.png \| A Pre-HTL Hatshepsut, and a [[GTF Myrmidon]].
			Image:RScreen0069.jpg \| The GVD Hatshepsut, in all its glory.
	</gallery>		</gallery>