Inferno: Alliance - Revision history

General Battuta: Removed some misused wording

2010-10-18T04:48:42Z

Removed some misused wording

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 18 October 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	==Player Comments==		==Player Comments==
	INFA is reasonably entertaining as long as you remember to play on a sufficiently low difficulty level. Commentators are right about the campaign's balance issues, but I wouldn't like to discourage anyone from higher difficulty settings, because the campaign's missions are rather short, so you can restart multiple times without too much time investment. This doesn't mean that all the missions are very hard. Some are just okay, but you have to know which ones, so I recommend Easy for the first play-through. The first mission is one such mission, which is too bad, because it gives a bad first impression. On the technical side of things, it's more proficient than a regular FS user-made campaign; you won't encounter any quasi-serious bugs in a casual playthrough. Mission goals and directives come true when they are supposed to, all important ships are on the escort list, and you cannot issue orders to those ships that are not supposed to be given orders. Very few campaigns manage to get these basics right, INFA is one of them.<br>There will be, however, a wide array of punctuation errors, but at least there are no other spelling mistakes with the exception of a couple of ''hangers''. INFA actually knows the difference between ''it's'' and ''its''. In this (and a lot of other) respects, INFA beats the official TBP campaigns ~~very, very severely~~.<br>I recommend INFA if you're not disturbed by difficulty and you're thirsty for a basic, regular military campaign with much action. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 15:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)		INFA is reasonably entertaining as long as you remember to play on a sufficiently low difficulty level. Commentators are right about the campaign's balance issues, but I wouldn't like to discourage anyone from higher difficulty settings, because the campaign's missions are rather short, so you can restart multiple times without too much time investment. This doesn't mean that all the missions are very hard. Some are just okay, but you have to know which ones, so I recommend Easy for the first play-through. The first mission is one such mission, which is too bad, because it gives a bad first impression. On the technical side of things, it's more proficient than a regular FS user-made campaign; you won't encounter any quasi-serious bugs in a casual playthrough. Mission goals and directives come true when they are supposed to, all important ships are on the escort list, and you cannot issue orders to those ships that are not supposed to be given orders. Very few campaigns manage to get these basics right, INFA is one of them.<br>There will be, however, a wide array of punctuation errors, but at least there are no other spelling mistakes with the exception of a couple of ''hangers''. INFA actually knows the difference between ''it's'' and ''its''. In this (and a lot of other) respects, INFA beats the official TBP campaigns.<br>I recommend INFA if you're not disturbed by difficulty and you're thirsty for a basic, regular military campaign with much action. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 15:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

	==Notes==		==Notes==

TopAce: /* Player Comments */ some more additions, now that I've finished the campaign

2010-10-17T16:45:41Z

Player Comments: some more additions, now that I've finished the campaign

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 17 October 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	==Player Comments==		==Player Comments==
	INFA is reasonably entertaining as long as you remember to play on a sufficiently low difficulty level. Commentators are right about the campaign's balance issues, but I wouldn't like to discourage anyone from higher difficulty settings, because the campaign's missions are rather short, so you can restart multiple times without too much time investment. ~~The~~ missions are ~~technically~~ more proficient than a regular FS user-made campaign; you won't encounter any quasi-serious bugs in a casual playthrough. Mission goals and directives come true when they are supposed to, all important ships are on the escort list, and you cannot issue orders to those ships that are not supposed to be given orders. Very few campaigns manage to get these basics right, INFA is one of them.<br>There will be, however, a wide array of punctuation errors, but at least there are no other spelling mistakes with the exception of a couple of ''hangers''. INFA actually knows the difference between ''~~they're'', ''there'', and '~~'~~there~~'', and ~~(amazingly), ''transferred'' isn't spelled with one~~ ''r''. In this (and a lot of other) respects, INFA beats the official TBP campaigns very, very severely.<br>I recommend INFA if you're not disturbed by difficulty and you're thirsty for a basic, regular military campaign with much action. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 15:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)		INFA is reasonably entertaining as long as you remember to play on a sufficiently low difficulty level. Commentators are right about the campaign's balance issues, but I wouldn't like to discourage anyone from higher difficulty settings, because the campaign's missions are rather short, so you can restart multiple times without too much time investment. This doesn't mean that all the missions are very hard. Some are just okay, but you have to know which ones, so I recommend Easy for the first play-through. The first mission is one such mission, which is too bad, because it gives a bad first impression. On the technical side of things, it's more proficient than a regular FS user-made campaign; you won't encounter any quasi-serious bugs in a casual playthrough. Mission goals and directives come true when they are supposed to, all important ships are on the escort list, and you cannot issue orders to those ships that are not supposed to be given orders. Very few campaigns manage to get these basics right, INFA is one of them.<br>There will be, however, a wide array of punctuation errors, but at least there are no other spelling mistakes with the exception of a couple of ''hangers''. INFA actually knows the difference between ''it's'' and ''its''. In this (and a lot of other) respects, INFA beats the official TBP campaigns very, very severely.<br>I recommend INFA if you're not disturbed by difficulty and you're thirsty for a basic, regular military campaign with much action. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 15:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

	==Notes==		==Notes==

TopAce: /* Player Comments */ flow

2010-10-17T15:30:27Z

Player Comments: flow

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 17 October 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	==Player Comments==		==Player Comments==
	INFA is reasonably entertaining as long as you remember to play on a sufficiently low difficulty level. Commentators are right about the campaign's balance issues, but I wouldn't like to discourage anyone from higher difficulty settings, because the campaign's missions are rather short, so you can restart multiple times without too much time investment. The missions are technically more proficient than a regular FS user-made campaign; you won't encounter any quasi-serious bugs in a casual playthrough. Mission goals, directives come true when they are supposed to, all important ships are on the escort list, and you cannot issue orders to those ships that are not supposed to be given orders. Very few campaigns manage to get these basics right, INFA is one of them.<br>There will be, however, a wide array of punctuation errors, but at least there are no other spelling mistakes with the exception of a couple of ''hangers''. INFA actually knows the difference between ''they're'', ''there'', and ''there'', and (amazingly), ''transferred'' isn't spelled with one ''r''. In this (and a lot of other) respects, INFA beats the official TBP campaigns very, very severely.<br>I recommend INFA if you're not disturbed by difficulty and you're thirsty for a basic, regular military campaign with much action. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 15:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)		INFA is reasonably entertaining as long as you remember to play on a sufficiently low difficulty level. Commentators are right about the campaign's balance issues, but I wouldn't like to discourage anyone from higher difficulty settings, because the campaign's missions are rather short, so you can restart multiple times without too much time investment. The missions are technically more proficient than a regular FS user-made campaign; you won't encounter any quasi-serious bugs in a casual playthrough. Mission goals and directives come true when they are supposed to, all important ships are on the escort list, and you cannot issue orders to those ships that are not supposed to be given orders. Very few campaigns manage to get these basics right, INFA is one of them.<br>There will be, however, a wide array of punctuation errors, but at least there are no other spelling mistakes with the exception of a couple of ''hangers''. INFA actually knows the difference between ''they're'', ''there'', and ''there'', and (amazingly), ''transferred'' isn't spelled with one ''r''. In this (and a lot of other) respects, INFA beats the official TBP campaigns very, very severely.<br>I recommend INFA if you're not disturbed by difficulty and you're thirsty for a basic, regular military campaign with much action. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 15:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

	==Notes==		==Notes==

TopAce: /* Comments */ my comment

2010-10-17T15:27:58Z

Comments: my comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 17 October 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	However, some have noted that the missions were too simple, and there was little pilot chatter to involve the players in the storyline. A few reviewers agreed that the story could have been presented more adeptly.		However, some have noted that the missions were too simple, and there was little pilot chatter to involve the players in the storyline. A few reviewers agreed that the story could have been presented more adeptly.

	==Comments==		==Player Comments==
	To be ~~filled in later~~.		INFA is reasonably entertaining as long as you remember to play on a sufficiently low difficulty level. Commentators are right about the campaign's balance issues, but I wouldn't like to discourage anyone from higher difficulty settings, because the campaign's missions are rather short, so you can restart multiple times without too much time investment. The missions are technically more proficient than a regular FS user-made campaign; you won't encounter any quasi-serious bugs in a casual playthrough. Mission goals, directives come true when they are supposed to, all important ships are on the escort list, and you cannot issue orders to those ships that are not supposed to be given orders. Very few campaigns manage to get these basics right, INFA is one of them.<br>There will be, however, a wide array of punctuation errors, but at least there are no other spelling mistakes with the exception of a couple of ''hangers''. INFA actually knows the difference between ''they're'', ''there'', and ''there'', and (amazingly), ''transferred'' isn't spelled with one ''r''. In this (and a lot of other) respects, INFA beats the official TBP campaigns very, very severely.<br>I recommend INFA if you're not disturbed by difficulty and you're thirsty for a basic, regular military campaign with much action. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 15:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

	==Notes==		==Notes==

TopAce: Reception section added

2010-06-22T16:17:08Z

Reception section added

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 22 June 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	'''Mods:''' ''Several exclusive ships''		'''Mods:''' ''Several exclusive ships''

			==Reception==
			Inferno: Alliance was generally well-received by the public. Most reviewers praised the mod asset and found the missions to be technically well-done.

			However, some have noted that the missions were too simple, and there was little pilot chatter to involve the players in the storyline. A few reviewers agreed that the story could have been presented more adeptly.

	==Comments==		==Comments==

Mobius: Category: INFA

2009-06-14T18:24:52Z

Category: INFA

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 14 June 2009
Line 34:		Line 34:
	*[http://www.freespacemods.net/download.php?view.94 Download \| FreeSpaceMods.net]		*[http://www.freespacemods.net/download.php?view.94 Download \| FreeSpaceMods.net]

	[[Category: ~~Old INF Continuity~~]]		[[Category: INFA]]
	[[Category: User-made Campaigns]]		[[Category: User-made Campaigns]]

Mobius: Link to the main Inferno board and the INFASA article added. All links have also been categorized

2009-06-14T18:08:13Z

Link to the main Inferno board and the INFASA article added. All links have also been categorized

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 14 June 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	==Related Links==		==Related Links==
			*[[Inferno: Alliance Standalone]]


			'''Websites'''
	*[http://inferno.hard-light.net/SOL/ Official website \| Hard-Light Productions.net]		*[http://inferno.hard-light.net/SOL/ Official website \| Hard-Light Productions.net]
	*[http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,43840.0.html Release thread \| Hard-Light Productions.net]
			'''Forums/Threads'''
			*'''[http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,43840.0.html Release thread \| Hard-Light Productions.net]'''
			*[http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/board,20.0.html Main board \| Hard-Light Productions.net]

			'''Downloads'''
	*[http://www.freespacemods.net/download.php?view.94 Download \| FreeSpaceMods.net]		*[http://www.freespacemods.net/download.php?view.94 Download \| FreeSpaceMods.net]

	[[Category: Old INF Continuity]]		[[Category: Old INF Continuity]]
	[[Category: User-made Campaigns]]		[[Category: User-made Campaigns]]

Mobius: Woomeister also worked on the tables

2009-06-14T18:02:32Z

Woomeister also worked on the tables

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 14 June 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Project Members==		==Project Members==
	*'''Woomeister''' - ''Leader, FREDder, modeller''		*'''Woomeister''' - ''Leader, FREDder, tabler modeller''

	*'''Mobius''' - ''Tester''		*'''Mobius''' - ''Tester''

Mobius: New article - Inferno: Alliance

2009-04-10T01:11:22Z

New article - Inferno: Alliance

New page

==Description==
Several years after the destruction of the [[SD Lucifer|SD ''Lucifer'']] and the collapse of the [[Delta Serpentis]] jump node, the shadows of the old [[Galactic Terran Alliance|GTA]] have completely vanished.

==Project Members==
*'''Woomeister''' - ''Leader, FREDder, modeller''

*'''Mobius''' - ''Tester''
*'''neoterran''' - ''Tester''
*'''Snail''' - ''Tester''

==Overview==
'''Number of missions:''' ''20''

'''Mods:''' ''Several exclusive ships''

==Comments==
To be filled in later.

==Notes==
An upgrade of the entire mod, campaign included, is currently WIP. It will be released with the name [[Inferno: Alliance Standalone]], or '''INFASA'''.

==Related Links==
*[http://inferno.hard-light.net/SOL/ Official website | Hard-Light Productions.net]
*[http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,43840.0.html Release thread | Hard-Light Productions.net]
*[http://www.freespacemods.net/download.php?view.94 Download | FreeSpaceMods.net]

[[Category: Old INF Continuity]]
[[Category: User-made Campaigns]]