Relentless - Revision history

TopAce: update

2011-07-23T09:44:59Z

update

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, 23 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==General==		==General==
	<b>Status:</b> ~~Unreleased~~		<b>Status:</b> Released

	<b>Release Date:</b> ~~N/A~~		<b>Release Date:</b> March 24, 2010

	<b>Mods Required:</b> ~~N/A~~		<b>Mods Required:</b> None

	==Campaign Description==		==Campaign Description==

TopAce: /* Player Comments */ some editing

2011-07-23T09:43:41Z

Player Comments: some editing

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 23 July 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==Player Comments==		==Player Comments==
	The was criticized for a number of asset-related technicalities, the absence of mission directives, and for the fact that the campaign always lets the player proceed, notwithstanding the actual mission's outcome.		The campaign was criticized for a number of asset-related technicalities, the absence of mission directives, and for the fact that the campaign always lets the player proceed, notwithstanding the actual mission's outcome.

	I'm sure I'm a rare breed to say it, but ~~I don't mind having no~~ directives~~, as their absence~~ didn't impede my walkthrough. Surely there were times when I wasn't quite sure what to do, but ~~the generic "Destroy Wing" or "Destroy Cruisers" directives wouldn't have helped anyway~~, so I~~'d just point out that the mission messages could~~ have ~~been more helpful in ''some'' cases~~. Most of the ~~time~~, however, I was aware what my standing orders were. ~~Warship~~ vs. warship combat ~~requires~~ little interference from the part of the player, as it turned out ~~after stupidly walking into a wall of AAA beams twice in the same mission. Later I figured I'd just dogfight and this tactic worked for the remainder of the campaign~~, with the exception of (IIRC) one mission.<br>As far as "real" bugs are concerned, there are many throughout. A lot of them are smaller oversights, but there are some serious ones as well, unfortunately. The last but three and the last missions are flat-out broken, so I ~~had to open~~ the missions in FRED ~~and~~ see how the campaign ends. On the plus side, the middle-part of the campaign was relatively solid. I saw few serious bugs, and whatever loadout I chose, I could complete the missions. I had good fun with the majority of the campaign; it's too bad about the ending. The missions tend to be long, but it's fine in my book if the missions are easy, and Relentless isn't a difficult campaign.<br>I wouldn't like to rate the campaign using the customary x/10 rating system, for two reasons. First, no single number could adequately sum up my feelings about the campaign. Second, most who will read this comment have played the campaign already. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 21:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)		I'm sure I'm a rare breed to say it, but absent directives didn't impede my walkthrough. Surely there were times when I wasn't quite sure what to do, but had there been any clarifying messages, I would have. Most of the times, however, I was aware what my standing orders were. After stupidly walking into a wall of AAA beams twice in the same mission, I learned that warship vs. warship combat required little interference from the part of the player, as it turned out to be universally applicable, with the exception of (IIRC) one mission.<br>As far as "real" bugs are concerned, there are many throughout. A lot of them are smaller oversights, but there are some serious ones as well, unfortunately. The last but three and the last missions are flat-out broken, so I opened the missions in FRED to see how the campaign ends. On the plus side, the middle-part of the campaign was relatively solid. I saw few serious bugs, and whatever loadout I chose, I could complete the missions. I had good fun with the majority of the campaign; it's too bad about the ending. The missions tend to be long, but it's fine in my book if the missions are easy, and Relentless isn't a difficult campaign.<br>I wouldn't like to rate the campaign using the customary x/10 rating system, for two reasons. First, no single number could adequately sum up my feelings about the campaign. Second, most who will read this comment have played the campaign already. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 21:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

	==Related Links==		==Related Links==

TopAce: /* Player Comments */ my comment

2011-07-22T21:54:48Z

Player Comments: my comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 22 July 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Player Comments==		==Player Comments==
	The was criticized for a number of asset-related technicalities, the absence of mission directives, and for the fact that the campaign always lets the player proceed, notwithstanding the actual mission's outcome.		The was criticized for a number of asset-related technicalities, the absence of mission directives, and for the fact that the campaign always lets the player proceed, notwithstanding the actual mission's outcome.

			I'm sure I'm a rare breed to say it, but I don't mind having no directives, as their absence didn't impede my walkthrough. Surely there were times when I wasn't quite sure what to do, but the generic "Destroy Wing" or "Destroy Cruisers" directives wouldn't have helped anyway, so I'd just point out that the mission messages could have been more helpful in ''some'' cases. Most of the time, however, I was aware what my standing orders were. Warship vs. warship combat requires little interference from the part of the player, as it turned out after stupidly walking into a wall of AAA beams twice in the same mission. Later I figured I'd just dogfight and this tactic worked for the remainder of the campaign, with the exception of (IIRC) one mission.<br>As far as "real" bugs are concerned, there are many throughout. A lot of them are smaller oversights, but there are some serious ones as well, unfortunately. The last but three and the last missions are flat-out broken, so I had to open the missions in FRED and see how the campaign ends. On the plus side, the middle-part of the campaign was relatively solid. I saw few serious bugs, and whatever loadout I chose, I could complete the missions. I had good fun with the majority of the campaign; it's too bad about the ending. The missions tend to be long, but it's fine in my book if the missions are easy, and Relentless isn't a difficult campaign.<br>I wouldn't like to rate the campaign using the customary x/10 rating system, for two reasons. First, no single number could adequately sum up my feelings about the campaign. Second, most who will read this comment have played the campaign already. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 21:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

	==Related Links==		==Related Links==

TopAce: expansion - not a stub anymore

2010-06-25T12:50:26Z

expansion - not a stub anymore

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 25 June 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==Player Comments==		==Player Comments==
			The was criticized for a number of asset-related technicalities, the absence of mission directives, and for the fact that the campaign always lets the player proceed, notwithstanding the actual mission's outcome.

	==Related Links==		==Related Links==
			*[http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php?topic=68750.0 Release thread] at [[Hard Light Productions]]


	~~{{stub}}~~
	[[Category: User-made Missions]]		[[Category: User-made Missions]]

SypheDMar at 15:46, 7 June 2009

2009-06-07T15:46:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 7 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Story~~:		==General==
			<b>Status:</b> Unreleased

			<b>Release Date:</b> N/A

			<b>Mods Required:</b> N/A

			==Campaign Description==
	Alpha 1, after making it to the node just in time, is reassigned along with the rest of his squadron to the GTD Kiev, last of the great Orion destroyers. The few remaining Blue Lions are infused into the 128th Nightshades squadron.		Alpha 1, after making it to the node just in time, is reassigned along with the rest of his squadron to the GTD Kiev, last of the great Orion destroyers. The few remaining Blue Lions are infused into the 128th Nightshades squadron.

	Despite his experience fighting the NTF and Shivans, his adventure has just begun. He will be flung far beyond the mundane tasks of mopping up Shivans and fighting piracy, into a world of corruption, rebellion, and dark cosmic mystery....		Despite his experience fighting the NTF and Shivans, his adventure has just begun. He will be flung far beyond the mundane tasks of mopping up Shivans and fighting piracy, into a world of corruption, rebellion, and dark cosmic mystery....

	~~Link:~~		==Player Comments==


			==Related Links==


	[~~Project in BETA phase. Expect release in the coming months.~~]		{{stub}}
			[[Category: User-made Missions]]

KappaWing at 04:13, 14 December 2008

2008-12-14T04:13:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 14 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Campaign by KappaWing~~, ~~never released. Apparently a follow up~~ to ~~a rough campaign released [http://www~~.~~hard-light~~.~~net/forums/index~~.~~php/topic~~,~~38491~~.0.~~html here] by KappaWing~~.		Story:
	[~~[Category:User-made_Campaigns]~~]
			Alpha 1, after making it to the node just in time, is reassigned along with the rest of his squadron to the GTD Kiev, last of the great Orion destroyers. The few remaining Blue Lions are infused into the 128th Nightshades squadron.

			Despite his experience fighting the NTF and Shivans, his adventure has just begun. He will be flung far beyond the mundane tasks of mopping up Shivans and fighting piracy, into a world of corruption, rebellion, and dark cosmic mystery....

			Link:

			[Project in BETA phase. Expect release in the coming months.]

Mustang19: removed delete and provided just a little bit of info on the campaign

2007-11-23T05:35:36Z

removed delete and provided just a little bit of info on the campaign

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 23 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{delete}}~~		Campaign by KappaWing, never released. Apparently a follow up to a rough campaign released [http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,38491.0.html here] by KappaWing.

	[http://www.~~game~~-~~warden~~.~~com~~/~~kappawing Not released yet~~. ~~More information can be found~~ here.]

	[[Category:User-made_Campaigns]]		[[Category:User-made_Campaigns]]

Mustang19 at 20:50, 21 November 2007

2007-11-21T20:50:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 21 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{delete}}

	[http://www.game-warden.com/kappawing Not released yet. More information can be found here.]		[http://www.game-warden.com/kappawing Not released yet. More information can be found here.]

	[[Category:User-made_Campaigns]]		[[Category:User-made_Campaigns]]

Wanderer: added category

2006-04-03T15:31:37Z

added category

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 3 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[http://www.game-warden.com/kappawing Not released yet. More information can be found here.]		[http://www.game-warden.com/kappawing Not released yet. More information can be found here.]

			[[Category:User-made_Campaigns]]

69.14.252.69 at 19:32, 24 November 2005

2005-11-24T19:32:41Z

New page

[http://www.game-warden.com/kappawing Not released yet. More information can be found here.]