Talk:Blue Planet Terran ship database - Revision history

Monitor at 17:41, 28 December 2010

2010-12-28T17:41:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 28 December 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Alrighty then - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		Alrighty then - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

			It was a good idea though - I suspect the headers could actually use a revision. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 17:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Snail: cool

2010-12-28T17:07:12Z

cool

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 28 December 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Yeah, that's why I did it that way XD. We could either upgrade the ship headers or downgrade the category headers. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 16:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		Yeah, that's why I did it that way XD. We could either upgrade the ship headers or downgrade the category headers. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 16:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

			Alrighty then - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Monitor at 16:03, 28 December 2010

2010-12-28T16:03:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:03, 28 December 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		:I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
	:Actually now looking back at it, I think I see why it was done the way it was originally... There seems to be very little visual difference between Level 3 and Level 4 headers besides a marginal size difference. Feel free to revert the changes if you think it's necessary, but I'll leave them for now. derp. :( - [[User:Snail\|Snailfail]] 15:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		:Actually now looking back at it, I think I see why it was done the way it was originally... There seems to be very little visual difference between Level 3 and Level 4 headers besides a marginal size difference. Feel free to revert the changes if you think it's necessary, but I'll leave them for now. derp. :( - [[User:Snail\|Snailfail]] 15:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

			Yeah, that's why I did it that way XD. We could either upgrade the ship headers or downgrade the category headers. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 16:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Snail: derp

2010-12-28T15:33:42Z

derp

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 28 December 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Glad to see the categories are a go. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		Glad to see the categories are a go. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

	I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		:I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
			:Actually now looking back at it, I think I see why it was done the way it was originally... There seems to be very little visual difference between Level 3 and Level 4 headers besides a marginal size difference. Feel free to revert the changes if you think it's necessary, but I'll leave them for now. derp. :( - [[User:Snail\|Snailfail]] 15:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Snail: random nitpick about header levels

2010-12-28T15:26:19Z

random nitpick about header levels

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 28 December 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Glad to see the categories are a go. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		Glad to see the categories are a go. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

			I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Monitor at 14:46, 28 December 2010

2010-12-28T14:46:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 28 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I intend to add actual data (what these ships do in game) but first I want to get them all in. I'll be working on it at 0500 UTC tomorrow, off until then. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 22:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)		I intend to add actual data (what these ships do in game) but first I want to get them all in. I'll be working on it at 0500 UTC tomorrow, off until then. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 22:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

			Glad to see the categories are a go. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Monitor: Created page with "I intend to add actual data (what these ships do in game) but first I want to get them all in. I'll be working on it at 0500 UTC tomorrow, off until then. --~~~~"

2010-12-23T22:58:43Z

Created page with "I intend to add actual data (what these ships do in game) but first I want to get them all in. I'll be working on it at 0500 UTC tomorrow, off until then. --~~~~"

New page

I intend to add actual data (what these ships do in game) but first I want to get them all in. I'll be working on it at 0500 UTC tomorrow, off until then. --[[User:Monitor|Monitor]] 22:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:03, 28 December 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		:I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
	:Actually now looking back at it, I think I see why it was done the way it was originally... There seems to be very little visual difference between Level 3 and Level 4 headers besides a marginal size difference. Feel free to revert the changes if you think it's necessary, but I'll leave them for now. derp. :( - [[User:Snail\|Snailfail]] 15:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		:Actually now looking back at it, I think I see why it was done the way it was originally... There seems to be very little visual difference between Level 3 and Level 4 headers besides a marginal size difference. Feel free to revert the changes if you think it's necessary, but I'll leave them for now. derp. :( - [[User:Snail\|Snailfail]] 15:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

			Yeah, that's why I did it that way XD. We could either upgrade the ship headers or downgrade the category headers. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 16:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 28 December 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Glad to see the categories are a go. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		Glad to see the categories are a go. --[[User:Monitor\|Monitor]] 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

	I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		:I think level 3 headers would be more suitable than level 2 headers for the ship categories... Looked kinda hard on the eyes with all the horizontal lines and such. Also, my understanding is that level 1 headers are reserved for the actual article titles (okay, in all honesty I didn't even ''know'' level 1 headers existed until today...) I'm going to go ahead and downgrade the header levels. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 15:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
			:Actually now looking back at it, I think I see why it was done the way it was originally... There seems to be very little visual difference between Level 3 and Level 4 headers besides a marginal size difference. Feel free to revert the changes if you think it's necessary, but I'll leave them for now. derp. :( - [[User:Snail\|Snailfail]] 15:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)