Talk:Crisis in Capella - Revision history

Aardwolf at 18:59, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T18:59:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 7 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The ''only'' thing that ''could'' be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the [[GTD Aquitaine]] in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the [[GTD Aquitaine]] was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, ''anybody'' can be recommended a transfer ''anywhere'' in ''any'' fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "''like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know''". IMVHO. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)		The ''only'' thing that ''could'' be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the [[GTD Aquitaine]] in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the [[GTD Aquitaine]] was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, ''anybody'' can be recommended a transfer ''anywhere'' in ''any'' fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "''like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know''". IMVHO. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

	Agreed, whatever idiot put it back in, is... well, an idiot. Someone should do the same for [[Crimson Sky]].		Agreed, whatever idiot put it back in, is... well, an idiot. Someone should do the same for [[Crimson Sky]].--[[User:Aardwolf\|Aardwolf]] 12:59, 7 February 2007 (CST)

Aardwolf at 18:58, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T18:58:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 7 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	The ''only'' thing that ''could'' be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the [[GTD Aquitaine]] in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the [[GTD Aquitaine]] was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, ''anybody'' can be recommended a transfer ''anywhere'' in ''any'' fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "''like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know''". IMVHO. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)		The ''only'' thing that ''could'' be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the [[GTD Aquitaine]] in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the [[GTD Aquitaine]] was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, ''anybody'' can be recommended a transfer ''anywhere'' in ''any'' fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "''like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know''". IMVHO. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

			Agreed, whatever idiot put it back in, is... well, an idiot. Someone should do the same for [[Crimson Sky]].

Selectah at 11:58, 9 November 2006

2006-11-09T11:58:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 9 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', ~~and~~ d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!). How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a handwritten, personalized letter pointing out that these missions ''are'', in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaigns(!) ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', d) they re-released them on their website, d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!) and f) '''V''' later even ''re-re-released'' them. How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a handwritten, personalized letter pointing out that these missions ''are'', in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaigns(!) ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

	Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		*Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

			The ''only'' thing that ''could'' be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the [[GTD Aquitaine]] in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the [[GTD Aquitaine]] was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, ''anybody'' can be recommended a transfer ''anywhere'' in ''any'' fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "''like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know''". IMVHO. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Selectah at 09:45, 7 November 2006

2006-11-07T09:45:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 7 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', and d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!). How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a personalized letter pointing out that these missions are, in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made ~~campaign~~ ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', and d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!). How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a handwritten, personalized letter pointing out that these missions ''are'', in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaigns(!) ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

	Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Selectah at 14:18, 6 November 2006

2006-11-06T14:18:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 6 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', and d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!). How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a personalized letter pointing out that these missions are, in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaign ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', and d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!). How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a personalized letter pointing out that these missions are, in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaign ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

			Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Selectah at 12:06, 6 November 2006

2006-11-06T12:06:10Z

New page

What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', and d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!). How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a personalized letter pointing out that these missions are, in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaign ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 9 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', ~~and~~ d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!). How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a handwritten, personalized letter pointing out that these missions ''are'', in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaigns(!) ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		What's with the "''this is not canon, because I say so''" policy? Okay then, let's see; a) Volition ''made'' the game demo, b) they ''released'' it, c) they ''made the missions(!)'', d) they re-released them on their website, d) the missions ''tie in with the FS2 story line''(!!) and f) '''V''' later even ''re-re-released'' them. How the (expletive) can ''anyone'' uphold the -- let's face it -- quite delusional idea that this is ''not'' canon? Because the staff from V hasn't sent each and every user a handwritten, personalized letter pointing out that these missions ''are'', in fact, taking place in the FS universe? (As an aside, they didn't do so for the retail version, either..) Then again, user made campaigns(!) ''are'' considered canon? Wow. I'm thoroughly impressed. Sorry for the rant, but I just had to, y'know. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 12:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

	Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		*Oh, btw; the article header is misspelled. Oh, btw 2; I'm removing the non-canon mention if no-one opposes. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 14:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

			The ''only'' thing that ''could'' be seen as being non-canon is the mention of the [[GTD Aquitaine]] in the command debriefing. Notwithstanding that the [[GTD Aquitaine]] was present throughout the Second Shivan Incursion, ''anybody'' can be recommended a transfer ''anywhere'' in ''any'' fleet. The tiny mention in the debriefing is simply not enough to warrant the bold claim "''like dude this is like not canon because it just like isn't y'know''". IMVHO. --[[User:Selectah\|Selectah]] 11:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)