Talk:Earth Defense - Revision history

Snail: replah. woopwoopwoop

2009-05-04T20:15:30Z

replah. woopwoopwoop

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 4 May 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
	:If the team says that it's okay in one article, then that's the way it will be. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:If the team says that it's okay in one article, then that's the way it will be. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
			::The team's opinion is to leave it in two separate articles, one for the current mod and the other one for the cancelled ED demo mod. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

TopAce at 20:08, 4 May 2009

2009-05-04T20:08:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 4 May 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
			:If the team says that it's okay in one article, then that's the way it will be. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Snail: reply

2009-05-04T20:00:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 4 May 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Mobius: Reply

2009-05-04T19:59:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 4 May 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
			::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]

Snail: edit

2009-05-04T19:54:54Z

edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 4 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:::::If someone does ~~reunite~~ it, then I will revert it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Snail: reply

2009-05-04T19:54:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 4 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			:::::If someone does reunite it, then I will revert it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Mobius: Reply

2009-05-04T18:24:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 4 May 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Inferno has multiple articles, '''all linked to the main Inferno article,''' meaning that everyone can read the criticisms I have personally added to be politically correct, not selfish. By applying this logic, even if Earth Defense has completely changed, both the Demo and the current continuity should be mentioned in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::Inferno has multiple articles, '''all linked to the main Inferno article,''' meaning that everyone can read the criticisms I have personally added to be politically correct, not selfish. By applying this logic, even if Earth Defense has completely changed, both the Demo and the current continuity should be mentioned in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
			::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]

Snail: reply. ZOIDBERG!

2009-05-04T17:49:45Z

reply. ZOIDBERG!

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 4 May 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Look at it this way then: The Earth Defense Demo has nothing to do with the current mod in production. Additionally, '''if Inferno can have multiple articles, I do not see why Earth Defense cannot.'''. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)		:Look at it this way then: The Earth Defense Demo has nothing to do with the current mod in production. Additionally, '''if Inferno can have multiple articles, I do not see why Earth Defense cannot.'''. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
	::Inferno has multiple articles, '''all linked to the main Inferno article,''' meaning that everyone can read the criticisms I have personally added to be politically correct, not selfish. By applying this logic, even if Earth Defense has completely changed, both the Demo and the current continuity should be mentioned in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::Inferno has multiple articles, '''all linked to the main Inferno article,''' meaning that everyone can read the criticisms I have personally added to be politically correct, not selfish. By applying this logic, even if Earth Defense has completely changed, both the Demo and the current continuity should be mentioned in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Mobius: Reply

2009-05-04T15:37:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 4 May 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Sad and unexpected. In other words, the new ED team doesn't want any connection to the old ED Demo, which is known not to be a top of the notch mod. Most of the new Earth Defense team refuses the connection between the new ED and the old, now outdated Demo - that's why edits of this page may result in continuous contrasts (and it's already happened). Because I think removing all info related to the Demo a bit selfish and quite pointless for Wiki purposes, because the Demo is the only available Earth Defense release (with the other one being a WIP), I'm creating this page to decide wheter or not the Demo should be included in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		Sad and unexpected. In other words, the new ED team doesn't want any connection to the old ED Demo, which is known not to be a top of the notch mod. Most of the new Earth Defense team refuses the connection between the new ED and the old, now outdated Demo - that's why edits of this page may result in continuous contrasts (and it's already happened). Because I think removing all info related to the Demo a bit selfish and quite pointless for Wiki purposes, because the Demo is the only available Earth Defense release (with the other one being a WIP), I'm creating this page to decide wheter or not the Demo should be included in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:Look at it this way then: The Earth Defense Demo has nothing to do with the current mod in production. Additionally, '''if Inferno can have multiple articles, I do not see why Earth Defense cannot.'''. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)		:Look at it this way then: The Earth Defense Demo has nothing to do with the current mod in production. Additionally, '''if Inferno can have multiple articles, I do not see why Earth Defense cannot.'''. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
			::Inferno has multiple articles, '''all linked to the main Inferno article,''' meaning that everyone can read the criticisms I have personally added to be politically correct, not selfish. By applying this logic, even if Earth Defense has completely changed, both the Demo and the current continuity should be mentioned in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]

Snail: formatting errors

2009-05-03T18:47:45Z

formatting errors

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 3 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==The Earth Defense Demo==		==The Earth Defense Demo==
	Sad and unexpected. In other words, the new ED team doesn't want any connection to the old ED Demo, which is known not to be a top of the notch mod. Most of the new Earth Defense team refuses the connection between the new ED and the old, now outdated Demo - that's why edits of this page may result in continuous contrasts (and it's already happened). Because I think removing all info related to the Demo a bit selfish and quite pointless for Wiki purposes, because the Demo is the only available Earth Defense release (with the other one being a WIP), I'm creating this page to decide wheter or not the Demo should be included in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		Sad and unexpected. In other words, the new ED team doesn't want any connection to the old ED Demo, which is known not to be a top of the notch mod. Most of the new Earth Defense team refuses the connection between the new ED and the old, now outdated Demo - that's why edits of this page may result in continuous contrasts (and it's already happened). Because I think removing all info related to the Demo a bit selfish and quite pointless for Wiki purposes, because the Demo is the only available Earth Defense release (with the other one being a WIP), I'm creating this page to decide wheter or not the Demo should be included in the main article. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:Look at it this way then: The Earth Defense Demo has nothing to do with the current mod in production. Additionally, ''''if Inferno can have multiple articles, I do not see why Earth Defense cannot.''''. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)		:Look at it this way then: The Earth Defense Demo has nothing to do with the current mod in production. Additionally, '''if Inferno can have multiple articles, I do not see why Earth Defense cannot.'''. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 4 May 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
	:If the team says that it's okay in one article, then that's the way it will be. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:If the team says that it's okay in one article, then that's the way it will be. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
			::The team's opinion is to leave it in two separate articles, one for the current mod and the other one for the cancelled ED demo mod. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 4 May 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
			:If the team says that it's okay in one article, then that's the way it will be. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 4 May 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			:::::::If someone is going to complain don't let it be you. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 4 May 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
			::::::Good point here, but I think someone is going to complain. Let's hope it won't happen, because [[Upgrading campaigns]] is enough. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 4 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::The team members have agreed that the way it is now is the way it should be. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 17:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		::::You need to know if Wiki contributors also agree. I'm afraid that, sooner or later, someone may "reunite" the new ED and the old Demo. Anticipating that edit would be, by far, the less-selfish solution. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	:::::If someone does ~~reunite~~ it, then I will revert it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)		:::::If someone does merge it, then I will revert it. The opinion of the team is more important than the opinion of Wiki contributors in this case. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)