Talk:GTM Cyclops - Revision history

Snail: hi

2011-07-08T11:56:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 8 July 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?		::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?
	::::: The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)		::::: The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
			:Just to be sure - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
			+Description:
			XSTR(
			"Special Issue
			Anti-Cruiser Bomb
			Non-Conventional Warhead
			", -1)
			$end_multi_text

Qent at 07:23, 8 July 2011

2011-07-08T07:23:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 8 July 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?		::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?
			::::: The description in the Weapon Selection screen (Retail only; MVPs change it to be more informative). [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 07:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

FlamingCobra at 01:18, 8 July 2011

2011-07-08T01:18:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 8 July 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
			::::Qent, the word "non-conventional" is not even in the article. Where did you get that?

Snail: sure why not

2011-07-07T22:15:31Z

sure why not

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 7 July 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
			:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

FlamingCobra at 21:31, 7 July 2011

2011-07-07T21:31:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 7 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
			::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Qent at 20:01, 7 July 2011

2011-07-07T20:01:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 7 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
			: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

FlamingCobra: Created page with "So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --~~~~"

2011-07-07T19:26:25Z

Created page with "So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --~~~~"

New page

So, what kind of warhead does it use? Antimatter? Fission? Fusion? Fission and Fusion? Matter-antimatter annihilation? --[[User:FlamingCobra|FlamingCobra]] 19:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 7 July 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		: "Non-conventional" could be any of those, and it could even vary among different versions of the Cyclops. I think that's as far as canon will get you. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 20:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
	::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)		::"Could it be a weapon that disrupts subatomic particles at the quark level? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
			:::There is no canon information to suggest this. Unless this has some relevance to the Wiki coverage of this topic, this discussion probably belongs on the forum. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)