Talk:GVD Hatshepsut - Revision history

Snail: grammar

2009-04-10T08:28:13Z

grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 10 April 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]		Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]
	*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	**I'd really hate agreeing with Mobius, but he's right on this one IMO. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)		**I really hate agreeing with Mobius, but he's right on this one IMO. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Snail: i said something foul.

2009-04-10T08:27:57Z

i said something foul.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 10 April 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]		Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]
	*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			**I'd really hate agreeing with Mobius, but he's right on this one IMO. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Mobius: Reply

2009-04-09T17:56:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 9 April 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Yes. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 18:09, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)		Yes. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 18:09, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)

			==The GVD Memphis==
	Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]		Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]
			*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]

Droid803 at 02:30, 7 April 2009

2009-04-07T02:30:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 7 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Yes. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 18:09, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)		Yes. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 18:09, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)

			Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]

TopAce at 18:09, 16 December 2005

2005-12-16T18:09:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 16 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Same as with the Colossus. Should this be changed into similar format as the other ship pages already have? For the performance and tech descriptions parts. [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 08:52, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)		Same as with the Colossus. Should this be changed into similar format as the other ship pages already have? For the performance and tech descriptions parts. [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 08:52, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)

			Yes. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 18:09, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Wanderer at 08:52, 16 December 2005

2005-12-16T08:52:13Z

New page

Same as with the Colossus. Should this be changed into similar format as the other ship pages already have? For the performance and tech descriptions parts. [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 08:52, 16 Dec 2005 (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 10 April 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]		Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]
	*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	**I'd really hate agreeing with Mobius, but he's right on this one IMO. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)		**I really hate agreeing with Mobius, but he's right on this one IMO. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 10 April 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]		Response to [http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=GVD_Hatshepsut&curid=1158&diff=22027&oldid=22026\| this]. It is inferred that the GVD Memphis is a Hatshepsut from the fact that the flight deck/main hall, for the short period of time between [[Straight, No Chaser]] and [[Argonautica]] looks identical to that of the [[GVD Psamtik]]'s. - [[User:Droid803\|Droid803]]
	*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		*I think it makes more sense to claim that [V] didn't have time (and/or didn't want) to create a third mainhall. I don't think we can say that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut only because of its supposed mainhall. Didn't the ''Galatea'' and the ''Bastion'' have different mainhalls? If the ''Memphis'' really was a Hatshepsut, it should have had a third mainhall. It's quite reasonable to assume that the ''Memphis'' was a Hatshepsut because that class of destroyers is extremely important in Vasudan fleets (important enough to transfer the surviving squadrons of the ''Psamtik'' to it) but yet still, we don't have enough info. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			**I'd really hate agreeing with Mobius, but he's right on this one IMO. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)