Talk:Multimedia Files - Revision history

Bruce89 at 11:53, 11 September 2007

2007-09-11T11:53:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 11 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Please just improve it instead of rejecting it totally. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)		:: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Please just improve it instead of rejecting it totally. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
	::: You didn't rewrite it; you simply undid my revert... Ugh. I was trying to point you in the right direction with my comments, but I see I'll have to do it myself. New edit posted. [[User:Goober5000\|Goober5000]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (CDT)		::: You didn't rewrite it; you simply undid my revert... Ugh. I was trying to point you in the right direction with my comments, but I see I'll have to do it myself. New edit posted. [[User:Goober5000\|Goober5000]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
	:::: I didn't, have a look at the [http://hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=*.OGG&diff=12274&oldid=12205 history]. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 06:48, 11 September 2007 (CDT)		:::: I didn't, have a look at the [http://hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=*.OGG&diff=12274&oldid=12205 history]. Here is a critical review of the content at the moment:
			::::*MP3 is not a container format, so saying "a popular competitor to .MP3" is wrong. Vorbis is "a popular competitor to .MP3", not Ogg. You could say Ogg "is a popular competitor to .MPEG", but this seems pointless.
			::::*"Also unlike MP3, Ogg is a container format, meaning that it..." seems clumsy, MP3 uses MPEG-1 as its container.
			:::: [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 06:53, 11 September 2007 (CDT)

Bruce89: hmph

2007-09-11T11:49:01Z

hmph

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 11 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Please just improve it instead of rejecting it totally. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)		:: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Please just improve it instead of rejecting it totally. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
	::: You didn't rewrite it; you simply undid my revert... Ugh. I was trying to point you in the right direction with my comments, but I see I'll have to do it myself. New edit posted. [[User:Goober5000\|Goober5000]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (CDT)		::: You didn't rewrite it; you simply undid my revert... Ugh. I was trying to point you in the right direction with my comments, but I see I'll have to do it myself. New edit posted. [[User:Goober5000\|Goober5000]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
	:::: I didn't, have a look at the [http://hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=*.OGG&diff=12274&oldid=12205 history]~~. Incidentally, copying the content of one page and putting it into another removes all the history. Please use the '''Move''' button in the future~~. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 06:48, 11 September 2007 (CDT)		:::: I didn't, have a look at the [http://hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=*.OGG&diff=12274&oldid=12205 history]. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 06:48, 11 September 2007 (CDT)

Bruce89 at 11:48, 11 September 2007

2007-09-11T11:48:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 11 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Please just improve it instead of rejecting it totally. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)		:: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Please just improve it instead of rejecting it totally. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
	::: You didn't rewrite it; you simply undid my revert... Ugh. I was trying to point you in the right direction with my comments, but I see I'll have to do it myself. New edit posted. [[User:Goober5000\|Goober5000]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (CDT)		::: You didn't rewrite it; you simply undid my revert... Ugh. I was trying to point you in the right direction with my comments, but I see I'll have to do it myself. New edit posted. [[User:Goober5000\|Goober5000]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
			:::: I didn't, have a look at the [http://hard-light.net/wiki/index.php?title=*.OGG&diff=12274&oldid=12205 history]. Incidentally, copying the content of one page and putting it into another removes all the history. Please use the '''Move''' button in the future. [[User:Bruce89\|Bruce89]] 06:48, 11 September 2007 (CDT)

Wanderer: added contents of *.ogg talk page

2007-09-11T09:48:55Z

added contents of *.ogg talk page

New page

==OGG discussion==
The revert IMO seems wrong. OGG is a container, not a audio codec. I'll have a think about how to phrase this better than I did before. [[User:Bruce89|Bruce89]] 13:01, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
:The revert isn't wrong. Note that the previous version said OGG is for "compressed multimedia files", not "compressed audio files". "Multimedia" includes both audio and video. Also, I think it's sufficient for the page to say that Vorbis is for audio and Theora is for video; the additional information is worded kind of confusingly and is probably too technical anyway. [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 13:52, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
:: I rewrote my edit, that is what the second edit by me was. Please do not revert it again before reading it. Please just improve it instead of rejecting it totally. [[User:Bruce89|Bruce89]] 15:18, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
::: You didn't rewrite it; you simply undid my revert... Ugh. I was trying to point you in the right direction with my comments, but I see I'll have to do it myself. New edit posted. [[User:Goober5000|Goober5000]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (CDT)