Talk:Terrans - Revision history

FlamingCobra: /* Ummm */

2011-08-01T18:46:54Z

Ummm

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 1 August 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Do we have an article on Space Marines? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)		Do we have an article on Space Marines? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
	*Nope, go ahead and make one. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)		*Nope, go ahead and make one. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
	**Too busy playing Baldur's Gate right now. Can't go through that cutscene to get a pic. I'll do it later.		**Too busy playing Baldur's Gate right now. Can't go through that cutscene to get a pic. I'll do it later. --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 18:46, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

FlamingCobra: /* Ummm */

2011-08-01T18:46:43Z

Ummm

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 1 August 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Do we have an article on Space Marines? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)		Do we have an article on Space Marines? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
	*Nope, go ahead and make one. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)		*Nope, go ahead and make one. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
			**Too busy playing Baldur's Gate right now. Can't go through that cutscene to get a pic. I'll do it later.

Snail: reply

2011-07-31T21:21:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 31 July 2011
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Do we have an article on Space Marines? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)		Do we have an article on Space Marines? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
			*Nope, go ahead and make one. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

FlamingCobra: /* Ummm */ new section

2011-07-31T17:12:50Z

Ummm: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 31 July 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. [EDIT]I took the initiative: [[:Category:Canon reference]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. [EDIT]I took the initiative: [[:Category:Canon reference]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
	**It's also worth looking at the FreeSpace Reference Bible, I think. We might be able to get more canonical information from there. [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 08:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)		**It's also worth looking at the FreeSpace Reference Bible, I think. We might be able to get more canonical information from there. [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 08:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

			== Ummm ==

			Do we have an article on Space Marines? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

General Battuta at 08:52, 26 January 2010

2010-01-26T08:52:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 26 January 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
	*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. [EDIT]I took the initiative: [[:Category:Canon reference]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. [EDIT]I took the initiative: [[:Category:Canon reference]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
			**It's also worth looking at the FreeSpace Reference Bible, I think. We might be able to get more canonical information from there. [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 08:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

TopAce: edited

2010-01-25T12:30:38Z

edited

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, 25 January 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
	*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. [EDIT]I took the initiative: [[:Category:Canon reference]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

TopAce at 12:18, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T12:18:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 25 January 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
			*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

General Battuta at 01:58, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T01:58:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 25 January 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	****Does it really matter? If I want to know about the history of the universe I'll zap down to Wikipedia. I don't want to read about British slaving ships in Mozambique or whatever on a FreeSpace encyclopedia. Anything not related to FreeSpace on this Wiki is irrelevant and must be removed. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)		****Does it really matter? If I want to know about the history of the universe I'll zap down to Wikipedia. I don't want to read about British slaving ships in Mozambique or whatever on a FreeSpace encyclopedia. Anything not related to FreeSpace on this Wiki is irrelevant and must be removed. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

			Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Snail: Enough about the blimey brits

2009-05-31T13:30:25Z

Enough about the blimey brits

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 31 May 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)		**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
	***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			****Does it really matter? If I want to know about the history of the universe I'll zap down to Wikipedia. I don't want to read about British slaving ships in Mozambique or whatever on a FreeSpace encyclopedia. Anything not related to FreeSpace on this Wiki is irrelevant and must be removed. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Mobius: Reply

2009-05-31T08:05:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 31 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==History section==		==History section==
	*The history section is chocka block with non cannon stuff (between freespace and the present day), and could probably be condensed a lot - this is a FS Wiki, not a history wiki. If nobody has any terribly compelling reason to keep it as it is, I'm going to rewrite it in a day or two. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 15:32, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)		The history section is chocka block with non cannon stuff (between freespace and the present day), and could probably be condensed a lot - this is a FS Wiki, not a history wiki. If nobody has any terribly compelling reason to keep it as it is, I'm going to rewrite it in a day or two. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 15:32, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)

	**Rewrite... ok. Deleting a lot of info... not ok. Do NOT destroy. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 16:29, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)		**Rewrite... ok. Deleting a lot of info... not ok. Do NOT destroy. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 16:29, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*I agree. All this stuff about the Romans and whatever is 100% irrelevant. I think we should get rid of all that stuff and keep things only relevant to FS. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)		*I agree. All this stuff about the Romans and whatever is 100% irrelevant. I think we should get rid of all that stuff and keep things only relevant to FS. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
	**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)		**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
			***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 26 January 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
	*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. [EDIT]I took the initiative: [[:Category:Canon reference]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)		*We should really, really copy/paste all the tech descriptions somewhere so that we could verify what's canonical and what's assumption. Some info may come from the FS1 intelligence entries. Others are likely assumptions. [EDIT]I took the initiative: [[:Category:Canon reference]]. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 12:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
			**It's also worth looking at the FreeSpace Reference Bible, I think. We might be able to get more canonical information from there. [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 08:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 25 January 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
	****Does it really matter? If I want to know about the history of the universe I'll zap down to Wikipedia. I don't want to read about British slaving ships in Mozambique or whatever on a FreeSpace encyclopedia. Anything not related to FreeSpace on this Wiki is irrelevant and must be removed. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)		****Does it really matter? If I want to know about the history of the universe I'll zap down to Wikipedia. I don't want to read about British slaving ships in Mozambique or whatever on a FreeSpace encyclopedia. Anything not related to FreeSpace on this Wiki is irrelevant and must be removed. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

			Can someone verify that this article is completely canonical? Drawn from the Reference Bible? [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 01:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 31 May 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)		**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
	***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]		***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]
			****Does it really matter? If I want to know about the history of the universe I'll zap down to Wikipedia. I don't want to read about British slaving ships in Mozambique or whatever on a FreeSpace encyclopedia. Anything not related to FreeSpace on this Wiki is irrelevant and must be removed. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 31 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==History section==		==History section==
	*The history section is chocka block with non cannon stuff (between freespace and the present day), and could probably be condensed a lot - this is a FS Wiki, not a history wiki. If nobody has any terribly compelling reason to keep it as it is, I'm going to rewrite it in a day or two. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 15:32, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)		The history section is chocka block with non cannon stuff (between freespace and the present day), and could probably be condensed a lot - this is a FS Wiki, not a history wiki. If nobody has any terribly compelling reason to keep it as it is, I'm going to rewrite it in a day or two. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 15:32, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)

	**Rewrite... ok. Deleting a lot of info... not ok. Do NOT destroy. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 16:29, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)		**Rewrite... ok. Deleting a lot of info... not ok. Do NOT destroy. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 16:29, 17 Dec 2005 (GMT)
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*I agree. All this stuff about the Romans and whatever is 100% irrelevant. I think we should get rid of all that stuff and keep things only relevant to FS. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)		*I agree. All this stuff about the Romans and whatever is 100% irrelevant. I think we should get rid of all that stuff and keep things only relevant to FS. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
	**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)		**I agree with the proposal that the article should be trimmed. However, the current article doesn't strike me a biased towards the English-speaking world. It doesn't even mention the U.S. (only American English), but mentions the EU as a first quasi-global union, which is historically correct in my view. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 11:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
			***It does give a lot of importance to the British Empire and ignores a lot of important civilizations, as well as they role. We don't need jingoism here on the Wiki. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]