Talk:Veteran Comments policy - Revision history

Androgeos Exeunt: Androgeos Exeunt moved page Talk:Veteran comments policy to Talk:Veteran Comments policy: Capped the C for consistency.

2020-07-04T06:40:47Z

Androgeos Exeunt moved page Talk:Veteran comments policy to Talk:Veteran Comments policy: Capped the C for consistency.

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:40, 4 July 2020
(No difference)

Snail: /* Should this be a normal page? */

2011-03-13T18:59:15Z

Should this be a normal page?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 13 March 2011
Line 53:		Line 53:
	Should this be a normal page or be moved to something like FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy (like [[FreeSpace Wiki: Administrators]])? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 16:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)		Should this be a normal page or be moved to something like FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy (like [[FreeSpace Wiki: Administrators]])? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 16:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
	*The latter, most likely. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)		*The latter, most likely. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
			**So is it a matter of simply moving the page (and redirecting all links) to [[FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy]] or are there other parameters that need to be changed? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

TopAce: /* Should this be a normal page? */ answer

2011-03-12T20:07:43Z

Should this be a normal page?: answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 12 March 2011
Line 52:		Line 52:
	==Should this be a normal page?==		==Should this be a normal page?==
	Should this be a normal page or be moved to something like FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy (like [[FreeSpace Wiki: Administrators]])? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 16:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)		Should this be a normal page or be moved to something like FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy (like [[FreeSpace Wiki: Administrators]])? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 16:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
			*The latter, most likely. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Snail: question

2011-03-12T16:58:02Z

question

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 12 March 2011
Line 49:		Line 49:
	:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::::::: Don't worry I'll get the rest. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)		::::::::: Don't worry I'll get the rest. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

			==Should this be a normal page?==
			Should this be a normal page or be moved to something like FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy (like [[FreeSpace Wiki: Administrators]])? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 16:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Snail: /* Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments */

2008-07-31T16:29:01Z

Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 31 July 2008
Line 48:		Line 48:
	::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
			::::::::: Don't worry I'll get the rest. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

Wanderer at 14:29, 31 July 2008

2008-07-31T14:29:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 31 July 2008
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

Ngtm1r: /* Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments */

2008-07-31T00:02:57Z

Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 31 July 2008
Line 46:		Line 46:
	::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)

Snail: /* Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments */

2008-07-30T23:09:40Z

Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 30 July 2008
Line 44:		Line 44:
	:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod.		::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	~~[[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)~~

Snail: /* Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments */

2008-07-30T23:09:15Z

Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 30 July 2008
Line 44:		Line 44:
	:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod.
			:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			[[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)

Ngtm1r: /* Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments */

2008-07-30T18:10:53Z

Comments and references to non-canon material in veteran comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 30 July 2008
Line 44:		Line 44:
	:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 13 March 2011
Line 53:		Line 53:
	Should this be a normal page or be moved to something like FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy (like [[FreeSpace Wiki: Administrators]])? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 16:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)		Should this be a normal page or be moved to something like FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy (like [[FreeSpace Wiki: Administrators]])? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 16:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
	*The latter, most likely. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)		*The latter, most likely. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 20:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
			**So is it a matter of simply moving the page (and redirecting all links) to [[FreeSpace Wiki:Veteran comments policy]] or are there other parameters that need to be changed? - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 31 July 2008
Line 48:		Line 48:
	::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
			::::::::: Don't worry I'll get the rest. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 31 July 2008
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			:::::::: Actually i did mean that editing existing game data - be it either via FRED or via table edits - shouldn't be added to the veteran comments. Otherwise we open the door for comments like ''Sathanas sucks when armed with targeting lasers loses to colossus every time'' or like ''The Edjo is the best sentry gun ever in - add some obscure mod only few have heard off where its armed with BFRed or with Ultra AAA''... Both comments would be true and wouldn't require anything else than FREDding to accomplish. Still i wouldn't think those as something that should be in the veteran comments. Of course we could add alternate veteran comment box (or something like it) for comments concerning the models/ships/weapons used with non-standard loadouts or in mods. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 09:29, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 31 July 2008
Line 46:		Line 46:
	::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
			::::::: Which is not what he said, deal with it. I also notice you only managed to find the one I pointed you to conveniently. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 19:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 30 July 2008
Line 44:		Line 44:
	:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::I agree, '''get rid of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 07:35, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		::::In my opinion any mods that tweak the content of the game could make their own page (like [[Derelict]]) and all the comments related to that mod could be posted there. So in short about this kind of comments in standard FreeSpace 2 veteran comments i would have to say... '''get rid of them'''. - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod.		::::: So, in other words, keep some of them, because you can hardly call anything accomplished purely in FRED a mod. [[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)		:::::: No, in other words, '''get rid of all of them'''. [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:09, 30 July 2008 (CDT)
	~~[[User:Ngtm1r\|Ngtm1r]] 13:10, 30 July 2008 (CDT)~~