User talk:Apollo - Revision history

Apollo at 23:29, 28 April 2013

2013-04-28T23:29:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 28 April 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** Blasphemy? No. But I think we already had this talk regarding the Hydra. There are a lot of ships already, and adding retextures of canon ships is just a waste of time for those that wan't to browse around. Also to be noted, I have nothing against it being on the wiki. I have quite a lot against it being on the User-made Ships page.		** Blasphemy? No. But I think we already had this talk regarding the Hydra. There are a lot of ships already, and adding retextures of canon ships is just a waste of time for those that wan't to browse around. Also to be noted, I have nothing against it being on the wiki. I have quite a lot against it being on the User-made Ships page.
	*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011		*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011
	**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 ~~(UTC)~~		**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 ~~(UTC)~~		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

General Battuta: comment edits

2012-11-03T22:49:06Z

comment edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 3 November 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Please note that the community decided to avoid profanity whenever possible on the Wiki, veteran comments and other opinion pieces included. Exaggerations ("piece of junk") are fine, but "piece of crap" is not, even if it's said in relation to the Osiris. Thanks. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 07:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)		Please note that the community decided to avoid profanity whenever possible on the Wiki, veteran comments and other opinion pieces included. Exaggerations ("piece of junk") are fine, but "piece of crap" is not, even if it's said in relation to the Osiris. Thanks. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 07:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

			==comment edits==

			Please comment all edits! [[User:General Battuta\|General Battuta]] 22:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

TopAce: /* Profanity */ preposition

2012-08-01T07:14:37Z

Profanity: preposition

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 1 August 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	== Profanity ==		== Profanity ==

	Please note that the community decided to avoid profanity whenever possible in the Wiki, veteran comments and other opinion pieces included. Exaggerations ("piece of junk") are fine, but "piece of crap" is not, even if it's said in relation to the Osiris. Thanks. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 07:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)		Please note that the community decided to avoid profanity whenever possible on the Wiki, veteran comments and other opinion pieces included. Exaggerations ("piece of junk") are fine, but "piece of crap" is not, even if it's said in relation to the Osiris. Thanks. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 07:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

TopAce: /* Profanity */ new section

2012-08-01T07:05:01Z

Profanity: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 1 August 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

			== Profanity ==

			Please note that the community decided to avoid profanity whenever possible in the Wiki, veteran comments and other opinion pieces included. Exaggerations ("piece of junk") are fine, but "piece of crap" is not, even if it's said in relation to the Osiris. Thanks. - [[User:TopAce\|TopAce]] 07:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Ktistai228 at 19:44, 14 May 2011

2011-05-14T19:44:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 14 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. ~~[[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)ktistai228~~[[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Ktistai228 at 19:44, 14 May 2011

2011-05-14T19:44:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 14 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. ~~ktistai228~~		*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)ktistai228[[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Ktistai228 at 19:43, 14 May 2011

2011-05-14T19:43:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 14 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
			*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. ~~ktistai228~~

Snail: reply

2011-05-14T13:52:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 14 May 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
			**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Apollo at 13:48, 14 May 2011

2011-05-14T13:48:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 14 May 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011		*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011
	**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Apollo at 13:47, 14 May 2011

2011-05-14T13:47:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 14 May 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011		*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011
	**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*~~Okay, I'll put it in [[:Category:User-made Ships]]. EDIT: Nevermind, it's already there. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 9:41, 14 May 2011~~		*

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 28 April 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** Blasphemy? No. But I think we already had this talk regarding the Hydra. There are a lot of ships already, and adding retextures of canon ships is just a waste of time for those that wan't to browse around. Also to be noted, I have nothing against it being on the wiki. I have quite a lot against it being on the User-made Ships page.		** Blasphemy? No. But I think we already had this talk regarding the Hydra. There are a lot of ships already, and adding retextures of canon ships is just a waste of time for those that wan't to browse around. Also to be noted, I have nothing against it being on the wiki. I have quite a lot against it being on the User-made Ships page.
	*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011		*I read that line, but since the Marauder was retabled, I didn't really think about it. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 21:05, 13 May 2011
	**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 ~~(UTC)~~		**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 ~~(UTC)~~		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 14 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. ~~[[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)ktistai228~~[[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 14 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. ~~ktistai228~~		*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)ktistai228[[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 14 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
			*Stay calm Apollo, it wasn't your fault. Snail, thanks for the [[User:Ktistai228\|Ktistai228]] 19:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC) tip. About the reskin list, I do agree for canon ships, it would be a great idea. There is a whole lot for them, some people are searching for them, yet they aren't listed. It is a must do. For non-canon ships however, reskins can quite easily be incorporated in their respective Wiki pages. ~~ktistai228~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 14 May 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		**Maybe we should continue the discussion about having an extra list for reskins. BTW, ktistai, please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, it makes your posts easier to identify and autogenerates the time stamp so it'll save you time, too. <br>@Apollo: I think the consensus last time this came up was that any reskins, even if they are retabled, weren't really "new ships" in and of themselves. I believe we decided they could have a Wiki page but weren't to be listed on the [[User-made Ships]] list (they can still be accessed from [[:Category:User-made Ships]]). We could reopen that discussion, I think it would be sensible to have a list of reskins as well, especially for "notable" ones like the reskins from Derelict. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 08:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
	*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)		*Okay, sorry about that. - [[User:Apollo\|Apollo]] 13:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
			**Don't worry, nobody's at fault. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)