User talk:Snail - Revision history

FlamingCobra: /* Hello */ new section

2011-09-25T22:12:47Z

Hello: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 25 September 2011
Line 86:		Line 86:
	**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
	***I, uh, I don't know. I'm not sure it's even supported by the uploader. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)		***I, uh, I don't know. I'm not sure it's even supported by the uploader. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

			== Hello ==

			Um... I've been working on a mission for a campaign that I'm thinking up and I was going to ask you to be a beta tester until I found out you are on the Earth Defense team. Then when I started looking at the story of Earth Defense I noticed there are a few similarities between my idea and ED's, so should I just scrap everything I have and start over or what? I also was thinking of using some assets from the ED asset release pack and a few things from BP. Is this also a bad idea? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 22:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Snail: /* Question */

2011-07-18T19:24:06Z

Question

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 18 July 2011
Line 85:		Line 85:
	*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)		*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
	**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
			***I, uh, I don't know. I'm not sure it's even supported by the uploader. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

FlamingCobra: you know what? I don't want to know.

2011-07-12T17:30:30Z

you know what? I don't want to know.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 12 July 2011
Line 85:		Line 85:
	*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)		*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
	**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
	**P.S. What in the world were you thinking I was going to say?

FlamingCobra: /* Question */

2011-07-12T02:52:14Z

Question

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 12 July 2011
Line 84:		Line 84:
	Snail, are you a moderator? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 01:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)		Snail, are you a moderator? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 01:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
	*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)		*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
			**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
			**P.S. What in the world were you thinking I was going to say?

Snail: /* Question */

2011-07-08T11:54:12Z

Question

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 8 July 2011
Line 83:		Line 83:

	Snail, are you a moderator? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 01:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)		Snail, are you a moderator? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 01:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
			*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

FlamingCobra: /* Question */ new section

2011-07-08T01:12:15Z

Question: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 8 July 2011
Line 79:		Line 79:
	Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
	:Yeah. However, I do think interesting trivia and facts about ships could go up there, so I'll leave those be. Basically I think we should go ahead and remove any subjective info from the blurbs but leave facts and stuff. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		:Yeah. However, I do think interesting trivia and facts about ships could go up there, so I'll leave those be. Basically I think we should go ahead and remove any subjective info from the blurbs but leave facts and stuff. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

			== Question ==

			Snail, are you a moderator? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 01:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Snail: /* On this... */ yes

2011-03-14T20:55:07Z

On this...: yes

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 14 March 2011
Line 78:		Line 78:
	::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
	Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
			:Yeah. However, I do think interesting trivia and facts about ships could go up there, so I'll leave those be. Basically I think we should go ahead and remove any subjective info from the blurbs but leave facts and stuff. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Black Wolf: /* On this... */

2011-03-14T11:06:36Z

On this...

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 14 March 2011
Line 77:		Line 77:
	*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)		*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
	::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
			Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Androgeos Exeunt: /* On this... */ In retrospect...

2011-03-14T05:15:33Z

On this...: In retrospect...

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 14 March 2011
Line 76:		Line 76:
	Hey, thanks. You did a great job slimming down the opening paragraph. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 13:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)		Hey, thanks. You did a great job slimming down the opening paragraph. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 13:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
	*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)		*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
			::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Snail: hmm

2011-03-13T18:55:20Z

hmm

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:55, 13 March 2011
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Hey, thanks. You did a great job slimming down the opening paragraph. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 13:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)		Hey, thanks. You did a great job slimming down the opening paragraph. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 13:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
			*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 18 July 2011
Line 85:		Line 85:
	*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)		*No. And I know exactly what you are going to say. Don't say it. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
	**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		**Truth be told, I wasn't going to say anything else and I had forgotten all about this until now, because I came back to ask you another question: Is it ok to upload .hcf files? --[[User:FlamingCobra\|FlamingCobra]] 02:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
			***I, uh, I don't know. I'm not sure it's even supported by the uploader. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 19:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 14 March 2011
Line 78:		Line 78:
	::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
	Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
			:Yeah. However, I do think interesting trivia and facts about ships could go up there, so I'll leave those be. Basically I think we should go ahead and remove any subjective info from the blurbs but leave facts and stuff. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 20:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 14 March 2011
Line 77:		Line 77:
	*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)		*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
	::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)		::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
			Maybe we should consider just paring them right down to a line or two. Ship name, class, period of activity, introduced during... basic facts we can apply across the board for every non mod ship (and a fair chunk of the mod ships too). All the other info can go into the relevant headings deeper in the article. [[User:Black Wolf\|Black Wolf]] 11:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 14 March 2011
Line 76:		Line 76:
	Hey, thanks. You did a great job slimming down the opening paragraph. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 13:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)		Hey, thanks. You did a great job slimming down the opening paragraph. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 13:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
	*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)		*Actually I have been thinking about the ship intro paragraphs. Currently a lot of them seem to be glorified Vet Comments which strike me as out of place. I think we might need to reconsider what does and does not belong in those blurbs. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 18:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
			::Yeah, we probably should. When I was uploading the retail ship images, I also tried to expand the opening paragraphs of most of these articles to give them a bit more substance. In a number of cases, I took leaves from the VCs, which might not have been the brightest idea. -- [[User:Androgeos Exeunt\|<font color="#9966CC">Androgeos</font>]] [[User_talk:Androgeos_Exeunt\|<font color="#40826D">Exeunt</font>]] 05:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)