Category talk:Acronyms: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I propose nuking this category, since all articles that used to be put here are now under their full, nonabbreviated titles. The only exception might be ETAK, the full name of which was revealed in an off-hand mention, so if we go by the "most well-known name for title" tradition, it could remain under [[ETAK]]. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 13:47, 12 July 2008 (CDT) | I propose nuking this category, since all articles that used to be put here are now under their full, nonabbreviated titles. The only exception might be ETAK, the full name of which was revealed in an off-hand mention, so if we go by the "most well-known name for title" tradition, it could remain under [[ETAK]]. - [[User:TopAce|TopAce]] 13:47, 12 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
Snail agrees. - [[User:Snail|Snail]] 16:15, 12 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:15, 12 July 2008
I propose nuking this category, since all articles that used to be put here are now under their full, nonabbreviated titles. The only exception might be ETAK, the full name of which was revealed in an off-hand mention, so if we go by the "most well-known name for title" tradition, it could remain under ETAK. - TopAce 13:47, 12 July 2008 (CDT)
Snail agrees. - Snail 16:15, 12 July 2008 (CDT)