Talk:Silent Threat: Reborn continuity: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:24, 7 June 2009

G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-fanon? After all, it's fanon not canon. - Snail 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't understand. First of all, G-canon is the term I read on HLP so using a different term would be pointless (I'm not inventing anything). Also, I'd like to remember that the article specifies that G-canon isn't V canon. We have several terms with the word canon on them (like "INF canon") which surely aren't connected to V. --- Mobius

Revision as of 21:17, 7 June 2009 view source Snail (talk \| contribs) 3,198 edits m bleh ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:24, 7 June 2009 view source Mobius (talk \| contribs) Administrators 1,931 edits Reply Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-''fanon''? After all, it's fanon not canon. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)		G-canon kinda implies that it is in some way canon, which it ain't. How's about we rename it G-''fanon''? After all, it's fanon not canon. - [[User:Snail\|Snail]] 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
			*Sorry, but I don't understand. First of all, ''G-canon'' is the term I read on HLP so using a different term would be pointless (I'm not inventing anything). Also, I'd like to remember that the article specifies that G-canon isn't V canon. We have several terms with the word canon on them (like "INF canon") which surely aren't connected to V. --- [[User:Mobius\|Mobius]]