Talk:SB Nahema: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Having anouther stupid moment. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Any good reason why some of the veteran comments are set as '''The following is not confirmed by Volition and is therfore not considered canon:'''? As by definition all the veteran comments are non canonical remarks of the ships. Disapproving other peoples opinions is not reason to do so. - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 05:21, 3 May 2006 (BST) | Any good reason why some of the veteran comments are set as '''The following is not confirmed by Volition and is therfore not considered canon:'''? As by definition all the veteran comments are non canonical remarks of the ships. Disapproving other peoples opinions is not reason to do so. - [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] 05:21, 3 May 2006 (BST) | ||
I'm so sorry, seems its me having a moment of idiocy and struggling with the basic definition of Veteren Comments. I could go further and explain myself, but I think it is better to apologize to Moonsword, and all users of the wiki: I'm sorry. --[[User: | I'm so sorry, seems its me having a moment of idiocy and struggling with the basic definition of Veteren Comments. I could go further and explain myself, but I think it is better to apologize to Moonsword, and all users of the wiki: I'm sorry. --[[User:Moniter|Mars]] 22:29, 3 May 2006 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 21:29, 3 May 2006
Any good reason why some of the veteran comments are set as The following is not confirmed by Volition and is therfore not considered canon:? As by definition all the veteran comments are non canonical remarks of the ships. Disapproving other peoples opinions is not reason to do so. - Wanderer 05:21, 3 May 2006 (BST)
I'm so sorry, seems its me having a moment of idiocy and struggling with the basic definition of Veteren Comments. I could go further and explain myself, but I think it is better to apologize to Moonsword, and all users of the wiki: I'm sorry. --Mars 22:29, 3 May 2006 (BST)