Talk:Weapon Comparison (FS2): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:31, 25 June 2009

Would it be better if secondaries were listed as 'Damage per Size' instead of 'Damage per Second'. Or is this kind of table totally useless anyway? - Wanderer 14:34, 19 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Sustained beam damage per second appears to use an incorrect formula. If somebody could verify this then I could change it. Qent 21:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:34, 19 December 2005 view source Wanderer (talk \| contribs) 2,937 edits No edit summary		Revision as of 21:31, 25 June 2009 view source Qent (talk \| contribs) 55 edits Beam damage incorrect Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Would it be better if secondaries were listed as 'Damage per Size' instead of 'Damage per Second'. Or is this kind of table totally useless anyway? - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:34, 19 Dec 2005 (GMT)		Would it be better if secondaries were listed as 'Damage per Size' instead of 'Damage per Second'. Or is this kind of table totally useless anyway? - [[User:Wanderer\|Wanderer]] 14:34, 19 Dec 2005 (GMT)


			Sustained beam damage per second appears to use an incorrect formula. If somebody could verify this then I could change it. [[User:Qent\|Qent]] 21:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)